We
are now at the stage of reviewing the evidence and information collected in the
various elements of this project and starting to interpret the findings. To
assist in this process we are tapping into health professional and research
methods expertise from the project Advisory Group.
At
our third Advisory Group meeting the research team gave an
update on each of the elements of this project. The systematic review has been
completed and the discussion and recommendations sections are being compiled.
The survey of health professionals has closed and the responses collated for
analysis. The third element, the qualitative study of patients’ perspectives is
almost complete with just a few more interviews to be held. In the meantime we
have started coding and the data emerging are looking very informative in
relation to the questions we set out to answer.
Meeting with the
Advisory Group was a chance for the research team to ask the health professionals
for their thoughts and advice. For example there was a discussion about how
often patients are reviewed to assess how they are managing with an orthotic, a
question in the healthcare professional survey. The Advisory Group suggested
comparing this information with BAPO
guidance on frequency of patient review. Some of the survey respondents dealt
with in-patient groups and after discussion with the Advisory Group we will try
to separate out the in-patient and out-patient results.
The
next stage now is to complete the analysis of the qualitative study and write
the full report for submission to our funders, the NIHR HTA programme. Once
they received the report they will check it and send it out to external peer
review. We will be asked to address any comments from the peer reviewers and
then the report will be published in the NIHR journal library. We will also be
disseminating the findings in a variety of other ways – which we will tell you
about in another blog.
Blogger: Catriona McDaid
Blogger: Catriona McDaid
No comments:
Post a Comment